NAIC Confident in Congressional
                         Response to Terrorism Insurance Issue
 

KANSAS CITY, Mo. (Jan. 15, 2003) — In response to a Dec. 27, 2002, letter from the Consumer Federation of America
(CFA), members of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) today expressed their continued support of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 and the interim guidance from the Treasury Department.

The CFA has urged state and federal officials to take more aggressive steps to protect and inform insurance consumers under the recently enacted act and has objected to the Treasury Department’s interim guidance that allows insurers to limit coverage for events related to nuclear, biological or chemical events if authorized to do so under state law. 

“Insurers have limited coverage for nuclear, biological and chemical events in commercial lines insurance products for quite some time,” said NAIC President and Arkansas Insurance Commissioner Mike Pickens. “What is excluded from coverage in these coverage limitations is the damage from nuclear, chemical or biological contamination of property, not the ensuing fire damage that would result from a nuclear or chemical blast. Radiation from failed nuclear reactors is also excluded, because coverage is available from another source. Thus the Treasury Department guidance does not allow for blanket exclusions as the CFA has implied.”

The CFA has also encouraged state insurance regulators to take an active and aggressive role in monitoring and preventing price gouging.

“State insurance regulators, through the NAIC, are taking steps to actively monitor insurance markets and stand ready to implement needed statutory remedies when abuses are discovered,” Pickens said. “State regulators have appointed a Market Conditions Working Group to monitor market conditions related to distressed insurance markets and terrorism, and they have been actively collecting information on a quarterly basis since 9/11.”

State regulators are also monitoring premium growth figures reported by insurers. This monitoring process will continue so that state regulators can be prepared to assist the Department of the Treasury in conducting its study of the effectiveness of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002.
 

“Not all state rate-filing laws are the same. States differ in the type of statutory provisions that they have available to them to constrain insurer rate changes,” Pickens continued. “Virtually all states have laws that require that rates not be excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory. If a policyholder believes that the rates charged by insurers are excessive, they should contact their state insurance regulatory official.”

The NAIC has appointed a Terrorism Insurance Implementation Working Group to assist the Department of the Treasury with implementation issues and clarification of the responsibilities that insurers have to their policyholders. This group has been very active in recent weeks helping the Treasury understand insurance and insurance regulatory issues and concerns.

All states have consumer assistance personnel to help aggrieved policyholders with their insurance problems. Visit www.naic.org to find out how to get in touch with your regulator.

 
About the NAIC  

Headquartered in Kansas City, Mo., the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) is a voluntary organization of the chief insurance regulatory officials of the 50 states, the District of Columbia and four U.S. territories. The association’s overriding objective is to protect consumers and help maintain the financial stability of the insurance industry by offering financial, actuarial, legal, computer, research, market conduct and economic expertise. Formed in 1871, it is the oldest association of state officials. For more information, visit NAIC on the Web at www.naic.org/pressroom.