The SERFF Board of Directors met on April 15, May 20 and June
13, 2009.
-
Received an update on SERFF financials. SERFF’s monthly
financials were presented, as well as a current, cumulative
look at SERFF, fully burdened with expenses that are not
shown on the standard financials for Department 89, from
1995. The Board requested that financial materials are included
in interested party meeting packets for the next meeting.
-
Received an update on the Dept. 89 2010 draft budget. The
Board learned that the 2010 budget is very similar to the
2009 budget. Both revenues and expenses show very little
growth, indicative of SERFF’s position in the rate
and form filing market. The 2010 Dept. 89 budget shows SERFF
revenue and expenses separate from OPTins.
-
Received modifications to SERFF’s Strategic Plan.
These modifications include updates on current enhancements
scheduled for SERFF v5.7 to be released in September; development
of a tool to make simple data moves from one data hoster
to another; and an allocation of development hours to create
a proof-of-concept code for several other scenarios related
to data modification and state retention of data.
-
Received a report on SERFF development. SERFF v5.7 is in
development and testing with a release date in the fall.
-
Received a report on SERFF marketing. Overall, through the
first five months of 2009, SERFF filing transactions are
down 9% compared to the same time last year. There have been
95 companies licensed to use SERFF since the Spring National
Meeting. Eighty-seven percent of SERFF’s 2,900 companies
use Electronic Funds Transfer.
-
Received a report on state implementation of Speed to Market
initiatives. Hawaii is eliminating a paper copy requirement
through legislation to complete the state’s initiatives.
Kentucky is expected to complete their health implementation
by the end of June. California should be fully implemented
across all life lines by the end of June.
-
Filled seats on the Product Steering Committee as follows:
Anthony Bonner (NY); Charlie Rapacciuolo (IIPRC); Susan Ezalarab
(representing IIPRC); David Logan (The Hartford); Cheryl Broughton
(John Hancock); and Charlotte Libby (Progressive).
-
Approved 120 hours of development toward proof-of-concept
work on four scenarios relating to data modification and state
data retention, and 240 hours of development to build a tool
to handle data moves from one data hoster to the other.
-
Discussed the SERFF bylaws issue and determined that the
bylaws subcommittee could include ex-officio as well as current
Board members. The subcommittee size has yet to be determined.
-
Reviewed a filing fee analysis, which showed that 78-86%
of the rate and form filings received by states are being
submitted via SERFF. SERFF’s growth has slowed, and
very little growth has been projected for the 2010 budget.